How to Pilot Claude in Your L&D Team
By this point in the series, one distinction should be clear. Claude can support a wide range of instructional design […]
By this point in the series, one distinction should be clear. Claude can support a wide range of instructional design […]
By this point in the series, one distinction should be clear. Claude can support a wide range of instructional design
A governance framework applied identically to every instructional designer creates two problems at once. It can place unnecessary friction around
A claim now appears almost everywhere in conversations about AI and learning: GenAI will make instructional designers better. That may
Most corporate learning is built for stable roles, linear careers, predictable skill gaps, and curricula that assume the next quarter
Understanding that instructional design expertise and AI capability serve different roles is a useful principle. It’s not, on its own,
If the other six principles of RAPID-AI define the mindset and guardrails around AI use, Design through stages is where
A lot of L&D leaders are now facing the same practical question: How do we know whether our instructional design
It’s one thing to argue that instructional design expertise matters more than AI tool selection or prompt quality. It’s another
Most conversations about AI in L&D focus entirely on generation — drafting scripts, storyboards, assessments. That focus misses one of